Socialist approach of
Planning
Socialist approach of planning is similar to interventionist
planning. The classical conception of socialist economic planning held by
Marxists involved an economic system where goods and services were valued,
demanded and produced directly for their use-value, as opposed to being
produced as a by-product of the pursuit of profit by business enterprises. This
idea of “production for use” is a fundamental aspect of a socialist economy.
This involves social control over the allocation of resources and production. This
differs from planning within the framework of capitalism, which is based on the
planned accumulation of capital in order to either stabilize the business cycle
(when undertaken by governments) or to maximize profits (when undertaken by firms),
as opposed to the socialist concept of planned production for use. “Socialist planning
“usually refers to the Soviet-type command economy.
The main features are:
Centrally
(government) controlled resources: The resources and factors of productions are
in control of government. Therefore, government decides-what, how and for whom
to produce.
Decisions
regarding production and investment are embodied in a plan formulated by a
central authority.
All
the basic decisions for the control and regulation of the economy are taken by
government.
Main
objective in production process is to maximize social welfare instead of
private profits.
Price
mechanism is given a minor role in resource allocation.
It
may consist of state-owned enterprises, private enterprises directed by the
state, or a combination of both.
Economic information, including consumer demand and
enterprise resource requirements, are aggregated and used to balance supply
(from available resource inventories) with demand (based on requirements for
individual economic units and enterprises) through a system of iterations in
this type of planning.
Planning under Capitalism
Capitalism is an economic and political
system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners
for profit and their self-interests, rather than by the state. Capitalism is
based on the idea that the market mechanism and price system is supposed to
allocate the resources efficiently. The consideration of prices is what
integrates and harmonizes the plans of each individual with the plans of all
other individuals and produces a fully and rationally planned economic system
under capitalism. This assumes that the market is a nonpolitical entity, and
something fully distinct from the state. Under capitalism there is no authority
who could perform the job of planning as under the system the resources are own
by the private sector, however, one can identify two types of planning ideology
in capitalist system also: one is the role played by capitalist governments, a
form of planning, within markets and capitalist societies. The other is the importance
of non-state forms of planning conducted by capitalist seeking to escape from
or limit the power of markets.
Planning under capitalism is based
on market economy and self-managed economy, where production, distribution,
pricing, and investment decisions are made by autonomous firms based upon their
individual interests rather than upon a macroeconomic plan. It refers to the
similar ideology to neo-liberalist planning.
Capitalist planning is based on the
planned accumulation of capital in order to either stabilize the business cycle
(when undertaken by governments) or to maximize profits (when undertaken by
firms), as opposed to the socialist concept of planned production for use. Therefore,
the objectives of capitalist planning are different.
Capitalist planning are some
variants of the traditional concept of state controlled economic planning. This
may include indicative type of planning aimed to solve the problem of imperfect
information in market or intra-firm and intra-industry planning.
Large corporations use planning to
allocate resources their prices and consumer demand for their products through
sophisticated statistical methods and econometric tools.
Features of Capitalist Planning mentioned at below:
i) No central authority to control
the resources and allocate the resources
ii) Independently operating
self-managed free enterprises are best resource allocators.
iii) Based on market mechanism and
price system.
iv) Government’s systematic actions
to achieve the macroeconomic goals can be in planned ways: like stabilizing the
business cycles, controlling the inflation, increasing employment and so on.
v) Various variant of
micro-planning, indicative planning, industry planning is in practice.
The capitalist planning is more
decentralized and indicative in nature.
Planning under Mixed Economy
Mixed economy represents a blend
approach of capitalism and socialism. Most mixed economies can be described as
market economies with strong regulatory oversight and governmental provision of
public goods.
If the private sector is wider,
the system is akin to capitalism. But as the public sector expands, it
approximates more and more to socialism. It is recognized that both the private
and public sectors have a vital role to play in the growth of the economy in
mixed type of economy and all the economies in the world fall under this
system. In mixed economy a very comprehensive planning is out of the question. It
is possible to plan the public sector programmer. Even in the organized private
sector as in major industries, the plan can work. But in the organized rural
sector, the planning authority feels seriously handicapped. That is why in most
developing countries, the planners have been terribly let down by agriculture.
With varying political and
ideological persuasions and at different stages of socio-economic development,
the objectives and formulation of economic plans are different. There are as
many types and forms of economic planning as the number of countries, because
each country formulates a plan according to its political and economic
environments and the goals of the national economy are set. In a general sense,
the term economic planning can be defined as formulation of control and regulation
of economic activity by public agency with a view to achieving well-defined
objectives. Since the key questions implicit in this definition such as formulation
of economic policies, regulation and control of economic activity and goals and
objectives of the national economy are closely related to the political
structure of a society, the techniques and patterns of economic planning thus
become intricately woven with its political system.